|
Post by shinnstheory on Sept 23, 2004 20:39:17 GMT 1
Ok. The main reason why I stated that was because of your comment about "running out of ideas in the women's division". Gormy's character has changed quite a bit. Venus is new. Starcrunch has 2 sides to her, that we've witnessed throughout the weeks. That's probably why she is ruling that division.
EDIT: About the split brand idea, my mind is already made up. Just keeping it Loki... I mean, low key.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 21:20:22 GMT 1
I don't care about who's "ruling" the divison. I'm ready to move on to bigger things.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 21:44:32 GMT 1
Can't we all just get along?
It's like watching two girls fight over a hairbrush.
To address this OOC real quick: Wench --- It comes from a reality standpoint. We can't have a 4'6" female beating the Hell out of male superstars. It's all got to do with creativity. PM Shinn's some ideas, it's as simple as that, or change your character in your promo's as you go, that's what all teh otehr women are doing. I have yet to hear any other women complain, adn they are being given exactly what you're given. This is the way the fed is ran this is how it is, and how it will be until we gain a good deal more wrestlers. Trust me, I've done this. It's a lot more limited than you think.
Shinns --- you're doing a great job, man. You get praised so much, and that should tell you something. I wouldn't tell you you're doing a great job if I thougt it sucked
Not trying to play a mod or anything, but back on topic people IN character comments on the subject, which is "P2PW Blitz"
IN Character: Eh, more backstage drama at P2PW. I hope this doesnt turn into the WWE. I think everyone will liven up once they get their pay raise when Blitz starts.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 22:36:07 GMT 1
Excuse me, but she's 4'9 and YES she can compete with the guys in the fed. And if not given a chance, that, my friend, is SEXIST!
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 22:53:55 GMT 1
lol, that was so in character! Sorry, but if you listen to The Wench character say it, it actually fits.
I'm not being sexist, I'm being a realist.
"Women should rule the country. You're smarter than us, you outnumber us, and you're much wiser. But do you know why you don't rule the country? Cause we can knock you out! [/Chris Rock]
In all seriousness though, should we not get an influx in female wrestlers, it may result to that one day. But, as long as your entertaining the readers and benfitting the P2PW, you should be happy. Go find more women, as Shinn's said. I'm not being a SEXIST, I assure you.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 22:57:30 GMT 1
Maybe I'm tired of fighting in the women's division. This is a voting fed. I should be given a chance. I don't know of anyone else seeing how the women in other feds are done by GUYS! And they have more than one character.
There was NEVER a rule that said a female couldn't fight for ANY of the other titles. Personally, we don't have enough for a women's division anymore. There are 4 of us. Thats it. If we get more, start it up again. If not, then at least we have a chance at titles too.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 23:01:32 GMT 1
You know as well as I do that if the Women's division was abolished, and then we got enough women to start it up again and put you back there, that this would stat all over again. You would be mad cause we put everyone back in the women's division, correct?
I think things are fine as they are.
Anyway, Since Soundscream isn't around, might as well make this a topic. Today on the Sound Off . . . The P2PW Women's Division
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 23:07:32 GMT 1
You think things are fine because there are plenty of MALE competitors. How would you feel if it was all females but 4 males? Would you not want a chance at other titles? Like I said, there was NEVER a rule stating the females only could fight for the women's title.
As for the women's division, it needs to be redone!
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 23:21:50 GMT 1
There never was a rule stating that, you're correct. But, it should be common sense that everything that is brought up is ultimately Shinns's decision, and I think that is stated somewhere.
Bottom Line: It is Shinn's Theory's decision what happens within the fed. He seems to not like the idea, so I guess that's that. I'm not taking sides, jsut stating the obvious.
And just liek the WWE, where there are a lot more males than females, they have to feud with the same people over and over, but they change their character to keep people entertained and keep themselves on top.
Anyway, I think the women's division is low in numbers, but great in entertainment. With Star haivng the title, Venus being the fresh new threat, Wench's mind-behind-the-stable character, and Gormy's awesome "had enough" character . . . there is a lot more there than most people will give credit for. I think that the women's divison is great.
|
|
|
Post by Scream on Sept 23, 2004 23:28:47 GMT 1
YOUR DEAD STARE. Anyway, today's new topic on the "Sound Off" (Not the STARE DOWN) is the Womens Divison..........
|
|
|
Post by Scream on Sept 23, 2004 23:29:55 GMT 1
I think the womens divison is decent as well. And rumor has it that Chilly Willy swings both ways anyways? That's just what I heard in the back.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 23:33:49 GMT 1
HA!
Man, with all this drama, I smell a Soundscream/Stare feud in the future.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 23:40:59 GMT 1
SO far, all I see disagreeing with me is the guys.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 23, 2004 23:43:02 GMT 1
So, just cause we're guys, that means our opinions don't matter? Hmm, that's a little SEXIST, isn't it?
EDIT: Sorry, on topic: My favorite female wrestler right now is Gormy. SHe seems to have the most interesting character as of right now.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 23, 2004 23:48:12 GMT 1
No, its not. Just a fact. You don't see anything wrong with it because you have plenty of people to compete with. How boring would it be for you if YOU had to compete against the same few people every show for month in and month out?
|
|
|
Post by ShaneMontez on Sept 24, 2004 0:23:03 GMT 1
I can see Wench's point. I had to fight the same person for 2 straight months in a trivia fed I was in. It got rather boring real quick and I ended up quitting the fed.
And no I didn't quit cause I was a baby and losing all the time...I was the champ and kicked his ass all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 24, 2004 0:25:07 GMT 1
FINALLY! Someone gets my whole point.
The fed is getting boring to me. NO. I will not turn face. I don't like being a face. But its becoming repetitve to me and thus boring. I want to have fun with it again.
|
|
|
Post by shinnstheory on Sept 24, 2004 6:03:22 GMT 1
Fuck all of this. I am about ready to lock this thread. We have staff members in here that say they have "No time to leave comments regarding their Rage Rules votes"..... Jesus! Suck it up and leave a comment!
You can sit in here and whore this thread, but you cant leave a few comments regarding OUR roster's promos? Fuck that! That's not staff..... That's disrespectful.
In my eyes, if you can't take the time to give GOOD effort to our e-Fed, that's just lame. People like that don't even deserve a spot.
WE ARE STAFF. THIS IS A RAGE RULES PPV. IF YOU CAN'T LEAVE COMMENTS, DON'T VOTE (THEY ARE USELESS WITHOUT COMMENTS).
|
|
|
Post by Wench on Sept 24, 2004 11:36:54 GMT 1
I wasn't whoring in this thread. I was trying to prove a point. But apparently, since it only seems to effect me, no one cares.
Thank you, Shane for being the ONLY one to see my point.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 24, 2004 11:48:30 GMT 1
This is going too far. Sort this out via pm if it's going to go on much farther, which hopefully it doesn't. I mean, you guys are making Soundscream cry cause his thread is being ruined . . .
*points to soundscream crying in a corner*
It's ok, little fella.
Now, anyway, I'm glad all the women are being showcased in matches at Rage Rules. Should really show who the best is, cause the way it's set up, with a number one contender and title match, it's kinda like a tournament that will have it's final match happen at another date.
|
|
|
Post by shinnstheory on Sept 24, 2004 15:19:12 GMT 1
I wasn't whoring in this thread. I was trying to prove a point. But apparently, since it only seems to effect me, no one cares. Maybe you aren't whoring this thread, but you are still putting enough time into this debate. You told me you didn't have time to leave comments for your Rage Rules promo ratings... I see your name pop into the site dozens of times a day. Ok, before this gets out of hand.... SoundScream I'm in character.....................starting NOW! SoundScream, I own this federation. Therefore, regardless whether you like it or not the new subject is: Inactive Members of the Roster.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 24, 2004 15:25:22 GMT 1
They should stay listed, until they pass a certain point of being inacticve (maybe a month or 2), and then they shoudl be released form the P2PW (unless they let the P2PW know, and give a logical reason beforehand).
But superstars like Steve and Shane who were among the elite would be a shame to let go, but if they want back, they'll let somebody know. But somoene like Londonite who I have not seen since I walked through the doors of the P2PW should be released form teh company
|
|
|
Post by shinnstheory on Sept 24, 2004 15:30:44 GMT 1
Steve has been gone longer than Londonite. If not, they left about the same time.
|
|
|
Post by stocko on Sept 24, 2004 16:19:59 GMT 1
people may have "real" stuff to do, but if they aint got 10mins to post then their life is to hectic to play any part in this, and imo, should be released!
obviously there are exceptions to this rule!
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Sept 24, 2004 16:36:05 GMT 1
Steve has been gone longer than Londonite. If not, they left about the same time. But I have seen steve backstage and talked to him [messenger]. Londonite has not been seen at all [messenger]. Oh well, I would keep them listed, now that I debate it. It makes it look more realisitic ot have some "inactive" superstars/
|
|