|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Apr 20, 2006 2:21:37 GMT 1
thank you NIN, Smackdown just dosnt do anything cool. They need to have a draft, or how about not makin it two brands, andjust one big one, like the good ol days in the 90s.
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Apr 20, 2006 2:23:54 GMT 1
One thing though, SMACKDOWN IS SHIT. it is boring, its slow, and the storylines are horrid. On the contrary my tite-panted friend. Smackdown! has actually been all right terms of WRESTLING. Something the producers of RAW seem to have forgotten about. On the B-show, you've got John Cena and his limited moveset feuding with Edge and HHH. How old is this storyline getting? Then there is Masters/Carlito...........shit. Kane talking to himself and beating up women. Where have we seen that before? RVD/Shelton is the only fresh thing going, but the E makes sure to keep him on the backburner in favor of HHH/Cena. The A-show however has been good in terms of wrestling. You've got London and Kendrick getting more in-ring and air time. This is good. The King of the Ring tourney is back and all the participants are solid. Again, this is good. JBL/Benoit is money and the World Title picture has been pretty versatile as of late. I like the fact that the title reigns have been short, like in the attitude era.
|
|
|
Post by ddt on Apr 20, 2006 2:34:12 GMT 1
thank you NIN, Smackdown just dosnt do anything cool. They need to have a draft, or how about not makin it two brands, andjust one big one, like the good ol days in the 90s. Two things. Number one: Nobody is forcing you to watch SmackDown! If you don't like it, stop watching. Simple as. Number two: If it was all one brand, just think about how much travel wrestlers would have to do. After they finish RAW, they have to get to SmackDown! then a possible PPV on top of that. Other than that, the roster would have to make some drastic cuts. A lot of people will lose their jobs. Not just wrestlers, but commentaters, ring announcers etc. And on top of all that, it means that the WWE superstars will be in double the pain they already are. In case you didn't know, wrestling actually hurts.
|
|
|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Apr 20, 2006 3:42:04 GMT 1
the commentators would stay on their show, and WWE should make their slots mon, wed, and fri. They can make a new show.
|
|
|
Post by ddt on Apr 20, 2006 4:02:30 GMT 1
Okay ...So my argument was that wrestlers would be in double the amount of pain, but now you want it triple the amount?
Yeah, WWE should make a new show. Are you going to give them the money to do so? No.
|
|
|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Apr 20, 2006 4:15:17 GMT 1
We are talking but Smackdown is still sucking. As for the comment of how the SD wrestlers are better wrestlers, well most of the TNA rosters better than alot of the guys in the WWE.
|
|
|
Post by ddt on Apr 20, 2006 4:27:04 GMT 1
Just stop watching SmackDown! That way, you don't have to put up with something that sucks so badly, and we don't have to listen to you complain about it. It's a win-win situation.
|
|
|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Apr 20, 2006 13:50:52 GMT 1
If you watch WWE you really have to watch both brands, plus I didnt say i didnt like ANY of the wretlers on SD.
|
|
|
Post by ChadClassic on Apr 20, 2006 14:13:03 GMT 1
I'm still curious as to why Smackdown is "slow" in your eyes?
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Apr 20, 2006 15:18:55 GMT 1
If you watch WWE you really have to watch both brands, plus I didnt say i didnt like ANY of the wretlers on SD. I don't get Smackdown. Will get it when the CW network takes over. I've downloaded some episodes. Smackdown seems to come off as a less professional version of Raw, but bascially, it has the same value. Raw and Smackdown both will have a great show one week, and a terrible one the next. Both shows have talent, and people who need to work on that aspect a lot. IMO, if I had to categorize them, I'd say that Raw is more entertainment, and Smackdown is more wrestling. Notice how the best mic workers are on Raw? Granted, Smackdown! has a couple, but you have to have some. But, most of the Smackdown stars are more "wrestling" orienated.
|
|
|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Apr 20, 2006 15:39:45 GMT 1
I'm still curious as to why Smackdown is "slow" in your eyes? Raw is fast paced, always action, but smackdown just takes a little while to get good. I have DVR (basically tivo) and i record smackdown, I usually stop and erase it brfore i finish, I actually favor iMPACT over smackdown, but id rather watch ECW anyday.
|
|
|
Post by Trent Matsunoshin on Apr 20, 2006 16:21:26 GMT 1
To be honest, I only watch Raw.
|
|