|
Post by Musicbunny on Oct 19, 2004 16:22:14 GMT 1
Good movie... The Rock didn't do that bad .... they could have done a little more with the movie, but still was good. Plus the eye candy wasn't bad...
|
|
|
Post by spaz on Oct 19, 2004 16:49:33 GMT 1
i can't get enough of that eye candy either.
i found the movie good, to sum it up. i liked welcome to the jungle better
sean william scott is my hero.
|
|
|
Post by KillerSundin (Formerly HBK) on Oct 20, 2004 13:00:31 GMT 1
It was good. A really short movie though.
|
|
|
Post by stocko on Oct 20, 2004 13:35:46 GMT 1
might watch it when its on sky movies, but to me, the rock is an awful actor and the movies i have seen him in, have both sucked big time!
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Oct 21, 2004 21:58:13 GMT 1
I want to see this, as well as Welcome To The Jungle. I think The Rock is a good actor. He'll never be Oscar material, but for the roles he does, he does them well.
|
|
|
Post by evenflow on Oct 21, 2004 22:53:22 GMT 1
saw it on the plane back from the U.S. thought it was ok but to agree welcome to the jungle is better. Knoxville is good in walking tall me thinks
|
|
|
Post by Musicbunny on Oct 22, 2004 18:43:28 GMT 1
oooh... "welcome to the jungle" .... I wasn't sure what you all were talking about at 1st.... Here it's called "The Rundown". I thought that was a good movie too, but I preferred this one for some reason... they could have done more with both of this movies ... but not bad for Dwayne aka the rock.
|
|
|
Post by lhw on Nov 15, 2004 13:44:09 GMT 1
I ordered this last night on cable, and it was ok. They changed so much of the original / true story that it was hardly worth the time to watch (I'm glad I didn't waste the money on the DVD). The original, while dated in the 70's, is still a heck of a lot better than this one.
|
|