|
Post by shinnstheory on Nov 4, 2004 0:10:17 GMT 1
I agree with Wench on this one. I found the new format a lot easier and less time consuming to read. I only have about 5 minutes each day to catch up.....it is VERY hard work sitting on my arse all day baking...but this way I was able to read everything AND take it all in for a change!!!!! Actually, Wench liked the shorter matches Stare was writing. She didn't like the listed version of the matches. All pat Stare on the back! The format will be put back to how it has been... with shorter matches, basically highlighting details in paragraph form.
|
|
|
Post by ChadClassic on Nov 4, 2004 1:13:19 GMT 1
Good show, Shinns.
I agree with the others, the Highlights aren't as good.
1-1 isn't bad, but it'll soon be 2-1 when I kicked Dickie's ass at Deserted!
Good job at beating me, Addryd. The better man won.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Nov 4, 2004 9:07:03 GMT 1
Personally I dont mind the highlights ( for weekly shows, matches for ppvs please )
I am glad that the writers are trying something different as they have lives as well.
Another great show, so boiler room brawl with Doc and Evenflow. . . . .very interesting
|
|
|
Post by diddlysquat on Nov 5, 2004 4:49:44 GMT 1
Awesome show, but the highlights kinda slowed down the excitement. Deserted and Blitz should both be good!
|
|
|
Post by Gormy on Nov 8, 2004 17:47:16 GMT 1
Sorry Shinns...I only got a minute to read what Wench had put and obviously didn't read it properly!!!! Theres a surprise! What I meant to say was I did like the highlights, it was easier for me to take in, in a few minutes. But because everyone else puts in lots more effort for the PPV's I think we all deserve a full blown 100000 word match each!!!!!! (yes, I meant to put that many 0's in!)
|
|
|
Post by shinnstheory on Nov 8, 2004 21:57:35 GMT 1
Full matches for PPVs always. That's a gimme.
|
|