|
Post by Simz on Feb 23, 2006 18:46:58 GMT 1
Yeah, it's that time of year supposedly. There is going to be cuts! But who!
|
|
|
Post by KillerSundin (Formerly HBK) on Feb 23, 2006 18:50:52 GMT 1
Vito, Ashley, Cade and or Murdoch, and some cruiserweights.
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Feb 23, 2006 18:57:25 GMT 1
Vito, yes. But Murdoch and Ashley, Don't think!
|
|
|
Post by KillerSundin (Formerly HBK) on Feb 23, 2006 18:58:47 GMT 1
Ashley cause the last two diva search winners have been released like a year after the diva search.
|
|
|
Post by stocko on Feb 23, 2006 19:07:02 GMT 1
ashley was the 2nd one, wasnt she? only christie hemme and ashley, as far as i know, have won the diva search
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Feb 23, 2006 19:11:36 GMT 1
Ashley, HBK, Chris Masters, What's left of the Mexicools, Heidenreich and Road Warrior Animal should all be given the pink slip.
Tatanka should be shot.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Feb 23, 2006 21:15:45 GMT 1
they wont release Ashley yet as she was given a years contract when she won
|
|
|
Post by Trent Matsunoshin on Feb 23, 2006 21:58:40 GMT 1
HBK?
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Feb 23, 2006 22:55:25 GMT 1
Yeah? And I doubt Masters is going. Plus Hedinriech is gone already!
|
|
|
Post by King Of Wrestling on Feb 24, 2006 3:03:28 GMT 1
HBK IS AWESOME, i think the heart throbs deserve to st.... get their asses kicked out they are so annoying.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Feb 24, 2006 3:23:21 GMT 1
Well, lucky you, that happened about a week ago, I believe.
Cuts?
Vito is my only definate assumption. I really am not for sure of anyone else. I think some Velocity and Heat guys will be the primary target, and you probably wont even notice
|
|
|
Post by KillerSundin (Formerly HBK) on Feb 24, 2006 13:43:46 GMT 1
I hope Cena gets cut.
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Feb 24, 2006 18:56:25 GMT 1
Val could even go. Aswell as Torrie!
|
|
|
Post by ChadClassic on Feb 24, 2006 19:17:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Feb 24, 2006 19:41:19 GMT 1
I hope Animal, OJ, Torrie, Danny Basham, Snitsky, Lance Cade, Rosey, Jamal, Viscera, Doug Basham, Mark Henry, Tatanka, Sharmell and Vito all get released.
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Feb 24, 2006 20:02:02 GMT 1
Yes. The Heartbreak Kid. The Fagboy. Gaybusters Anonymous. Seriously, it's run its course. Much like the Undertaker. I know these guys love what they do and can still deliver in the ring when they want to. But I think a lot of what's wrong with WWE today is a lot of the 80s and early 90s talent refuse to hang it up and let it go. It becomes old and comical and that spot could go to a newer, fresher talent. I mean, I can't sit through a Ric Flair match these days without laughing to tears because you just can't take it seriously anymore. I am beginning to understand why Aladdin cannot respect HHH v. Cena as a main event, and in part I agree with him. Us oldheads remember a time when Hogan would headline Wrestlemania after Wrestlemania after Wrestlemania. But his generation is a bit different. They are faster. Their attentions spans shorter. (that is not an insult) They live in the fast paced information age where the same ol' same ol' becomes a turnoff fast. So unless people are on his nutsack, then yes, HBK should run for the hills.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Feb 24, 2006 20:04:01 GMT 1
Shawn has a lot left to give, he is putting the yonger talent over, something Hogan, Taker would / will not do
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Feb 24, 2006 20:07:56 GMT 1
Get off his sack, Cactus. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Feb 24, 2006 20:13:59 GMT 1
Seriously, it's run its course. Much like the Undertaker. If someone is still over, how can that be considered "running it's course"? IMO, neither of these men have ran their course, cause they are both still over. HBK was approached by the WWE to make a return. He didn't decide to not hang it up himself. Veterans are there to put people over. Sure, there are times when they are thrown over certain people or given short title runs, but mostly, they are there to make the "newer" talent look good. Flair had a great TLC match with Edge, and after that, I knew he could still go.
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Feb 24, 2006 20:18:33 GMT 1
You make some valid points Stare, and I love your passion for the game. But seeing some of these guys from a decade ago just makes me laugh. Yes, they can still go and will still get that "pop". But to some, it's just comical and stupid. I mean Ric Flair doesn't even look like a "wrestler" anymore. Just a matter of opinion but I must respect your argument.
|
|
|
Post by stocko on Feb 25, 2006 9:29:25 GMT 1
Shawn has a lot left to give, he is putting the yonger talent over, something Hogan, Taker would / will not do what? dude, you are saying taker does not put people over, what?
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Feb 25, 2006 16:48:47 GMT 1
Taker, Flair, HBK . . . they all put people over.
Even these people have to win sometimes, though. If they lost all the time, then the credibility you would gain from beating them wouldn't be there.
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Feb 25, 2006 19:38:19 GMT 1
Who was the last person taker put over? If he really put over Orton, then taker wouldn't have won the HIAC.
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Feb 25, 2006 19:44:31 GMT 1
But taker had lost the last two matches. Plus Taker hasn't won a HITC match in ages, and they want to keep the whole ' HITC is takers match'.
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Feb 25, 2006 19:51:37 GMT 1
But winning two macthes and then losing the big match and the feud isn't putting him over. Plus for the ones Orton won, it was because of his dad and because it was a handicap match.
Plus, Taker won 3 matches against Orton.
|
|