|
|
Post by Faster Pussycat! on Nov 23, 2005 10:08:32 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Spackle on Nov 23, 2005 18:43:20 GMT 1
Besides the excess of Jimmy Rave and Julius Smokes and the lack of Colt Cabana, they were good.
It's too bad those Flippity McWippity's can't tell a story. Like Batista! That man has got some personality. Like at Taboo Tuesday. Batista comes out. He displays real pathos while being double-teamed by Vader and Goldust, but displays true determination by hitting them back. The anguish as he pretends to be hit by a belt is clearly visible. And the courage as he suddenly comes back from nowhere without any clear reason why to win via powerbomb brings a lump to your throat.
SEE? THAT’S WRESTLING AS STORYTELLING! IN YOUR FACE, FLIPPY STYLES!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by eCo on Nov 30, 2005 0:12:09 GMT 1
 First thing is that I have nothing against RoH. My point here is that you kids can't really compare RoH with the WWE just because, if anything, they are two totally different kind of companies. Both companies take pride in different thing and specialize in different areas. You can however compare TNA to WWE, in which of course the WWE owns TNA (yeah I still think TNA is an absolute joke) by a mile. When the Eddie video was made, he was still a drug addict, in which the WWE fired him. Yeah Eddie was saying how he loved RoH, but once he went sober, he went straight back to the WWE. Seriously, if you kids think that the WWE is so evil, why is it that veterans who have an uttermost respect for the sport still wrestle there? Why don't they go to RoH, or TNA where they can wrestle in High School Gyms and so they can take on the dreaded Mr. Nobody? Just because the WWE doesn't invest in a bunch of wrestlers under the age of 24, who do a couple of backflips and throw shows in High School Gyms, doesn't make them inferior. Again I have nothing against RoH, because they specialize in a different kind of pro-wrestling. I just always stand on this belief. WWE #1 McMahon family #1
|
|
|
|
Post by Spackle on Nov 30, 2005 0:45:02 GMT 1
First of all, I don't hate the WWE, and I've never called them evil. I've critisized shitty storylines, shitty wrestlers, and what I see as bad decisions for the company. I want them to get better, I want them to be as good as I remember them from my childhood and early teen's, and when they do, I'll scurry right back to watch.
Wrestling wise, WWE is inferior. If you want to argue this, fine, but I can't see any argument against it. But wrestling isn't always the focal point, most people want good gimmicks/angles. I still think RoH is better in this respect too, but whatever.
I'd also like to know why TNA is such a joke. Just asking why you think that, not really disagreeing.
Also, you think Eddie, or any fairly-well known person goes to WWE out of uttermost respect for the company and wrestling as a whole?
That's the silliest thing you've ever said.
RoH #72
Cabana family #1
|
|
|
|
Post by ddt on Mar 15, 2006 17:01:44 GMT 1
Just to, well, rub it in your face ...I've met Colt Cabana twice. He's trained me once. And chopped me. Another thing, if you want to try and say ROH is better than WWE, do not, and I repeat DO NOT ...show video footage of Jack Evans. EDIT: Also, sorry for bringing back a dead topic.  |
|
|
|
Post by Spackle on Mar 16, 2006 4:47:09 GMT 1
YOU FUCKER.
If you meet him again I want you to bring me some of his blood, so I can drink it and gain his powers.
And Jack Evans is good against Abyss. It's always fun to watch a flippy wigger get murdered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Faster Pussycat! on Mar 16, 2006 10:05:26 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Matsunoshin on Mar 16, 2006 19:27:35 GMT 1
Awesome stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Mar 16, 2006 22:24:23 GMT 1
Yeah.
Why doesn't he ever use the Shell Shocker in TNA?
|
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Mar 16, 2006 23:08:14 GMT 1
Damn rite, Shelly is awsome! |
|
