|
Post by brockandsable on Oct 6, 2005 23:11:59 GMT 1
Splitting from my associations was the best thing to happen to me as well. But your associates weren't that good. SIMZ is still learning punctuation and capitalization for his promos and Hercules is on some "now you see me now you don't" type shit. He's inconsistent. And there was this Vegeta guy, who for the longest time, I just thought was an alter ego of you. You splitting from the Blood Pack was to your benefit because the rest were so terrible. Miles and Amie are actually good, and share the same passion for wrestling that I do. We would never let each other down. Plus the concensus is that we are the best faction of the year. And coming from all of you, that carries a lot of weight.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Oct 6, 2005 23:13:31 GMT 1
That's a valid concern, but why should it be the end of Deathrow if the roster is split? I still think Deathrow TNT and Deathrow Blitz would be a great idea if this split went ahead. Finding new members wouldn't be a problem at all. But that could lead to the 2 nWo type thing IMO Had that annoucement been made prior to the thread being locked, I would have come with something much better, and thus I would not have let Cactus down. That man deserves gold. You did not let me down, in all honesty and this is not a dig at chad but tyler blew us all out of the water with his promo for that match. I still am anti-draft, But, after reading both SoL's and Reapers points ( and I value their opinions ) I am begining to think that maybe we should try it till say Christmas? After all if it does not work we can always come back to this tried and tested method.
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Oct 6, 2005 23:19:47 GMT 1
Another question I have is will interbrand matches in the likeness of Undertaker v. Orton a la Wrestlemania 21 only take place at Fever or will there be one or two at every P2PW PPV?
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Oct 6, 2005 23:21:07 GMT 1
This is not rigged. How can it be? If we wanted to rig it, we would just have went ahead and went through with it anyway. Whatever you guys want, you'll get. If the majority of you put across a well thought out arguement for a split, you'll get one. If the majority of you do the same against a split, then that's what we'll go with.
And polls are easier to rig than a thread that states what the masses want clearly in black and white.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Oct 6, 2005 23:23:35 GMT 1
Quick question which seems out of place here but if we get a spilt, what will hapen to superstar sunday? will there be one for TNT and one for Blitz? If not will it be disbanded, or used by both shows a week apart ?
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Oct 6, 2005 23:27:06 GMT 1
Superstar Sunday will stay the same format. It will still consist of people from both shows. Perhaps people who haven't been called up to either roster? We'll see. But, it will not be brand exclusive, should the split happen. I can answer that question because it's my creation.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Oct 6, 2005 23:29:03 GMT 1
Cool so it will be used like OMW type thing ? Loving the Keira sig
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Oct 6, 2005 23:31:15 GMT 1
You mean OVW. It could just alternate every week. So one week solely Bltiz and the next week just TNT.
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Oct 6, 2005 23:31:21 GMT 1
Blonde moment alert, blonde moment alert!
What's an OMW....? I'm almost afraid to ask.
And glad you like the sig!
EDIT: Yeah, it was a blonde moment. I should have known you meant OVW! I'm tired.
|
|
|
Post by brockandsable on Oct 6, 2005 23:35:23 GMT 1
Nice sig Rocky. Where's mine?
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Oct 6, 2005 23:35:42 GMT 1
See you knew what I meant.
The more I think of it the split would be a good thing, stables can be formed and it could lead to a surviour series type ppv but with stables / teams from cross brands
|
|
|
Post by Faster Pussycat! on Oct 7, 2005 0:02:59 GMT 1
Why not make SS weekly a lowercard interpromotional match?
I think we should use the 2/3'rds rule, you know, where the winner needs at least 2/3'rds of the votes to win.
And another thing that a few other's have said, why not make groups count as a single pick?
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Oct 7, 2005 3:39:50 GMT 1
Just want to clairfy something from both point of views on this topic.
This threads only purpose is not to make the decision of whether we should have a draft or not, but to also gain input on how people would like us to go about it if it does happen. If it doesnt happen, it gives us a lot of valuable opinions on what to do different.
Also, some people are being hard to read! lol
You've got NIN who is Anti-draft, but keeps giving insight on how to make the draft work, as if it's already happening. You've got Cactus who declare's he's anti draft, but wants a trial run, you've got Aladdin who is anti-draft, then pro-draft, then anti-draft again.
Good stuff, guys. Your opinions are valued, just so you know. This is in no way rigged, what you guys are saying is being listened to, and we'll do our best to meet your needs, whether a draft occurs or not.
|
|
|
Post by Faster Pussycat! on Oct 7, 2005 5:04:39 GMT 1
Stare, I'm just giving input on what I think should or would be best to happen if a draft does take place.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Oct 7, 2005 5:08:29 GMT 1
I wasnt coming down on you and criticizing you. The three I listed were examples of people who were really thinking both sides through, hence my "good stuff, guys".
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Oct 7, 2005 11:37:02 GMT 1
I'm really sorry Stare, i didn't mean to be heard, but peeps like Rocky, Nation and Sol give good arguements which tend to sway my decision. I'm good with whatever really, as long as gets going well.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Oct 7, 2005 12:56:23 GMT 1
Again, I wasn't saying it was a negative thing, it's a positive thing. The fact that you've gone back and forth, NIN is going with one side and giving advice for the other, and Cactus is trying to figure out what he wants shows that you three are thinking both sides through and THAT IS A GOOD THING.
I'm saying "good stuff, guys", not "choose one side or the other". I think it's a good thing is people flip-flop sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus on Oct 7, 2005 14:20:17 GMT 1
I know what you mean Stare we are reading the whole thing and seeing other peoples points of view which IMO is a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Oct 7, 2005 19:56:42 GMT 1
That's what the discussion is all about. Getting your point across. It will be listened to.
|
|
|
Post by Simz on Oct 7, 2005 22:09:19 GMT 1
Would you make a new rage belt, If there was a split? or would a Rage match lets say on Blitiz are called danger matches and then you would make a danger title .
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Oct 7, 2005 23:43:30 GMT 1
That's not been decided yet.
Nothing is honestly finalized on what would happen if a draft did, or even didnt happen for that matter.
There are changes me and Shinns have suggested back and forth between each other for a draft, and should a draft not happen.
So, what will happen with belts? What will happen with tag teams? Factions? What will the ppv schedule look like? Ideas for these have been tossed out, but nothing has been decided.
And yes, I'm going to keep what those ideas we talked about were private, as I think just hearing your ideas for the fed in general, without our input, is a good thing.
But, this is on the draft, so make sure it is still based around that
|
|
|
Post by Aladdin on Oct 7, 2005 23:52:50 GMT 1
Sorry to sound impatient, but when do you think the decision will actually be finalized. Because i don't think i'm alone when i say that I'd just like to get back to the shows.
|
|
|
Post by Stare on Oct 8, 2005 0:05:47 GMT 1
I can't put a timeframe on it. Honestly, we've got about 20 votes, some are just opinions from outside people, some are not clear-cut choices, some are flat out telling you what they want.
It's been discussed for having a final poll after this to make the decision after we think people have made up their minds and they're set on a choice, but that's not even been confirmed.
There are still a lot of people that need to give their opinion. This affects everyone, and if you've been avoiding it, I urge you not to.
|
|
|
Post by Faster Pussycat! on Oct 8, 2005 0:06:28 GMT 1
^^What he said.
|
|
|
Post by _the j-man on Oct 9, 2005 11:06:33 GMT 1
I really don't see the need for the brand split at all. Because if there is only one show per roster doesn't that still cause the same problem from before? There will be 4 matches and half the roster still won't make the card.
I think a Minor League P2PW would work out well. But that's if people would be willing to accept that. You have to go to the Minor Leagues to get to the Majors like Baseball in America.
I think if a roster split happen, not only the tension of possible lag on one show and smooth flowing on the other. people not being happy with the roster they're on, if one roster performs lower than the other. etc.
but in the end if the roster split happens. i think we should split the titles into two's
TNT: Undisputed Internet & Rage Blitz!: International & Tag Team
Rosters: TNT Aladdin "The Tiger" Cactus Chilly Willy Cole Slocum Da Man Dickie Cha'mone E2 FunAmie Gormy Scott Nortis Sean Patterson Shinn's Theory SIMZ Spackle Stevo 316 "The NZA" NIN Horror
P2PW World Heavyweight Champion: Nation
Roster: Blitz! _the j-man ChadClassic Chilly Willy Ecos "The Chosen One" J.T. Blade MVP-Don Red Ninja Rocky Soul Reaper Soundscream Starcrunch Stare The Executioner "The Tiger" Vegeta Trent Acid "The Assassin" Tyler Stone
With the World Champion being able to appear on both shows.
I think if everything ran smoothly it could increase work ethic. But, either way I'm happy. ;D But my vote is No.
|
|